3 edition of Modern U.S. civil-military relations found in the catalog.
Modern U.S. civil-military relations
by Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University in Washington, DC
Written in English
|Other titles||Modern US civil military relations, Wielding the terrible swift sword|
|Statement||David E. Johnson|
|Series||McNair paper -- 57, McNair papers -- no. 57|
|Contributions||National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xi, 107 p.|
|Number of Pages||107|
American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive assessment of the subject since the publication of Samuel P. Huntington's field-defining book, The Soldier and the this seminal work as a point of departure, experts in the fields of political science, history, and sociology ask what has been learned and what more needs to be investigated in Price: $ At a deeper level, these events reflect a breakdown among the three parties to the triad of civil-military relations: the military itself; the civilian officials who ostensibly control the Author: Gregory D. Foster.
The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations is a book written by political scientist Samuel P. the book, Huntington advances the theory of objective civilian control, according to which the optimal means of asserting control over the armed forces is to professionalize is in contrast to subjective control, which involves ISBN: Civil-Military Relations and the U.S. Strategy Deficit The primary focus of those who have examined civil-military relations since the s has been on the issue of civilian control of the military. Of course, civilian control is important, especially in the case of a liberal society such as the United States.
—Peter D. Feaver, author of Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations “Unprecedented in breadth on this vital subject, The Pentagon and the Presidency will be regarded as one of the seminal works on U.S. civil-military relations. The Great War and America: Civil-Military Relations during World War I (In War and in Peace: U.S. Civil-Military Relations) by Nancy Gentile Ford: Civil-Military Relations on the Frontier and Beyond, by Charles A. Byler: A Clash of Cultures: Civil-Military Relations During the Vietnam War by Orrin Schwab:
1980 census of population and housing
Bioassay of dapsone for possible carcinogenicity.
Chap. CCCCLXIV. An act for making a further provision of eighteen hundred pounds, for furnishing His Majestys troops quartered in the colony with necessaries.
Cases and Materials on Copyright and Other Aspects of Entertainment Litigation
Old glass paperweights
Let us work for peace
North Sea oil 1973
The grand tea master
devil in Massachusetts
Geometric drawing and the Waldorf School plan
Description and tuning instructions for Amal GP.2 racing carburetter (Series 516) with remoteley mounted type 510 float chamber
Smithsonian Institution (National Museum Act of 1965).
Knights templar tactics and drill, with the working text and burial service of the orders of knighthood, as adopted by the Grand commandery of the state of Michigan. By Ellery Irving Garfield.
Simplifying procedures through forms control.
This book develops a responsible and practical method for evaluating the success, failure, or “crisis” Modern U.S. civil-military relations book American civil-military relations among its political and uniformed elite.
The author’s premise is that currently there is no objectively fair way for the public at large or the strategic-level. Get this from a library. Modern U.S. civil-military relations: wielding the terrible swift sword. [David E Johnson; National Defense University.
Institute for National Strategic Studies.]. Today’s U.S. civil–military relations also point to the issue of trust: the mutual respect and understanding between civilian and military leaders and the exchange of candid views and Author: Mackubin Thomas Owens. The Modern War Studies series provides a forum for the best of the new military history.
The scope of this series is global, comparative, and comprehensive. It embraces topics as diverse as operations; biography; strategy and politics; civil-military relations; institutional, organizational, and social history; and the impact of technology on warfare from the mid-eighteenth century to the.
“Redefining the Modern Military is very much an 'inside out' view of the military as a profession. That is the book's glory - the perspectives from within that it provides are invaluable.
And beyond the chapters' contents the book is doubly important for what it represents: a strong and growing movement within the US military and allied western forces that is agitating for a. The purpose of U.S. Civil-Military Relations After 9/11 is to examine the issues that these fine writers raise from the perspective of the theory and practice of civil-military relations, placing them in the context of the ongoing renegotiation of the civil-military bargain in America.
The following essay is drawn from the book’s introduction. : Crisis, Agency, and Law in US Civil-Military Relations (): Daniel Maurer: Books.
A great text with another view on civil-military relations. Breaks Feaver's principal-agent model of US civil-military relations and builds a very strong case of a three-way relationship.
Stevenson effectively demonstrates that while the US military "is a very loyal and subordinate institutation it is often cross-pressured by its two masters Cited by: American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive assessment of the subject since the publication of Samuel P.
Huntingtons field-defining book, The Soldier and the this seminal work as a point of departure, experts in the fields of political science, history, and sociology ask what has been learned and what more needs to be investigated in the4/5(16). Civil–military relations is an interdisciplinary area of research, reflecting the work of political scientists, military, sociologists, and historians.
History and culture, the constitution of the state and the statutes and practices arising therefrom, changes in the international security environment, technology, the character of conflict, and the changing concept of “soldier-hood” Cited by: 2.
Mary K. Kniskern, David R. Segal, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), Civil–Military Relations and Citizenship.
Scholars in the mid-twentieth century attempted to describe the structural relationships between modern military forces and their host societies. These official Federal Government books cover the strategic partnership between civil society and military organizations established to protect it.
It covers topics, such as civil society and democracy, political theory, societal conflicts, defense and security issues. More editions of Modern U.S. Civil-Military Relations: Wielding the Terrible Swift Sword: Modern U.S. Civil-Military Relations: Wielding the Terrible Swift Sword: ISBN () Softcover, Diane Pub Co, Civil-Military Relations in Zambia: A Review of Zambia's Contemporary CMR History and Challenges of Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (ca.
), ed. by Gilbert Chileshe, Margaret Chimanse, Naison Ngoma, Paul Lwando, and. Book Review: Civil-Military Relations and Shared Responsibility A valuable and deeply researched source that provides a rarely-so-comprehensive comparative analysis of civil-military relations across four distinct nations; Canada, Russia, Germany, and the U.S.
Civil-Military RelationsMilitary and nonmilitary groups Traditional and modernizing societies The modern state Military interventions in politics BIBLIOGRAPHY The term “civil–military relations” refers to the role of the armed forces in a society.
Their book asks tough questions that members of the profession should be asking and it will spark new new questions that will drive the conversation about military professionalism for at least the next decade.
The Modern Military Profession is a must-read for anyone who cares about professional military education or civil-military relations.". In his seminal book on civil-military relations, The Soldier and the State, Samuel P. Huntington described the differences between the two worlds as a contrast between the attitudes and values held by military personnel, mostly conservative, and those held by civilians, mostly liberal.
Each world consisted of a separate institution with its own operative rules and norms. This project seeks to characterize changes in the civil-military dynamic, understand how they may affect major areas of national security and foreign policy, and develop recommended courses of action for civilians and military professionals alike.
Introducing Command Climate OnCSIS's International Security Program hosted an all-day conference on U.S. civil-military. The theory of civil-military relations itself is based on democratic theory and its most fundamental principle – ensuring that the people have ultimate control over the government.
Discover the. The article challenges Huntington’s prescriptive division of labour in order to understand modern defence governance and some of the fundamental changes to civil-military relations that have.and Politics of Civil-Military Relations inwhich became one of the most prominent civil-military theories of modern times.
His theory is widely regarded to be the modern foundation on civil-military relations. The focus of Huntington’s theory of civil-military relations is the professionalism of the military and officers as Size: 1MB.Military: U.S. Civil-Military Relations in the Early Twentieth Century MATTHEW Radford University The presidency of Theodore Roosevelt marked a time of considerable tension in civil-military affairs.
Roosevelt made the modernization of the armed services a top prior ity, but frequently he complicated civil-military relations in the process.